2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 23 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Garza v. Davis.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Garza v. Davis Anchor | green | “a narrow exception to the exhaustion requirement applies if a petitioner can demonstrate that exhaustion is futile.” | 19 |
| 2 | Samples v. Wiley | green | “exhaustion of administrative remedies is not rendered futile simply because a prisoner anticipates he will not obtain relief on administrative appeal before the final year of his sentence ... the twelve-month mark in the second chance act is an express statutory maximum, and not…” | 4 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.