2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 17 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Canadian National Railway Co. v. Montreal, Maine & Atlantic Railway, Inc..
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Canadian National Railway Co. v. Montreal, Maine & Atlantic Railway, Inc. Anchor | green | “roof of a mere possibility of injury is insufficient to justify an injunction” | 10 |
| 2 | Daniel J. GATELY, Et Al., Plaintiffs, Appellees, v. COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS, Et Al., Defendants, Appellants | green | “federal court cannot dispense with the irreparable harm requirement in affording injunctive relief” | 7 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.