4 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 23 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Hamdan v. United States Department of Justice.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Hamdan v. United States Department of Justice Anchor | green | “conducted a search reasonably calculated to uncover all relevant documents.” | 7 |
| 2 | Wiener v. Federal Bureau of Investigation | green | “specificity is the defining requirement of the vaughn index.” | 6 |
| 3 | Pacific Fisheries, Inc. v. United States | green | “the burden is on the agency to establish that all reasonably segregable portions of a document have been segregated and disclosed.” | 6 |
| 4 | Hamdan v. United States Department of Justice | green | “reasonably calculated to uncover all relevant documents.” | 4 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.