5 canonical passages across 5 cases, quoted by 17 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Harrison v. Ash.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Harrison v. Ash Anchor | green | “thus, to the extent that the denial of qualified immunity is based on a factual dispute, such a denial falls outside of the narrow jurisdiction of this court.” | 5 |
| 2 | United States v. Chris Wright | green | “separate tests are applied to determine whether the government's failure to preserve evidence rises to the level of a due process violation in cases where material exculpatory evidence is not accessible versus cases where 'potentially useful' evidence is not accessible.” | 3 |
| 3 | ARMAND VILLASANA, JR., — v. WELDON WILHOIT, — | green | “he recovery of 1983 damages requires proof that a law enforcement officer other than the prosecutor intended to deprive the defendant of a fair trial.” | 3 |
| 4 | Meals v. City of Memphis, Tennessee | green | “defendant is required to limit her argument to questions of law premised on facts taken in the light most favorable to the plaintiff.” | 3 |
| 5 | Lindsay v. Bogle | green | “the brady obligation applies only to prosecutors” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.