6 canonical passages across 5 cases, quoted by 161 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Frank E. Adams v. Flora J. Holland, Warden.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Frank E. Adams v. Flora J. Holland, Warden Anchor | green | “deemed to have exhausted all available state remedies for a claim” | 43 |
| 2 | Charles A. Perkins v. Robert Lecureux | green | “worked to his actual and substantial disadvantage.” | 28 |
| 3 | Young v. Hofbauer | green | “the state court's factual determination was 'objectively unreasonable' in light of the evidence presented in the state court proceedings.” | 28 |
| 4 | Thomas Hill v. Cindi Curtin | green | “if the state court applies a rule that contradicts the governing law set forth in supreme court cases' or 'if the state court confronts a set of facts that are materially indistinguishable from a decision of the supreme court and nevertheless arrives at a different result.” | 24 |
| 5 | Omar Pouncy v. Carmen Palmer | green | “it is not enough for the petitioner to show some unreasonable determination of fact; rather, the petitioner must show that the resulting state court decision was 'based on' that unreasonable determination.” | 23 |
| 6 | Young v. Hofbauer | green | “objectively unreasonable' in light of the evidence presented in the state court proceedings.” | 15 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.