7 canonical passages across 7 cases, quoted by 23 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from California Native Plant Society v. City of Rancho Cordova.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | California Native Plant Society v. City of Rancho Cordova Anchor | green | “exhaustion of administrative remedies is a jurisdictional prerequisite to maintenance of a ceqa action.” | 5 |
| 2 | Tomlinson v. County of Alameda | green | “strong public policy of protecting the environment.” | 3 |
| 3 | California Aviation Council v. County of Amador | green | “plaintiffs must show that board failed to give the notice required by law, or that they are members of the public addressing a public wrong and no notice of the hearing was given them in any form” | 3 |
| 4 | Stand Tall on Principles v. Shasta Union High School District | green | “completion of the eir process.” | 3 |
| 5 | Mani Bros. Real Estate Group v. City of Los Angeles | green | “even where the administrative remedy may not resolve all issues or provide the precise relief requested by a plaintiff, the exhaustion doctrine is still viewed with favor 'because it facilitates the development of a complete record that draws on administrative expertise and prom…” | 3 |
| 6 | Gilroy Citizens for Responsible Planning v. City of Gilroy | green | “presume that official duty has been regularly performed.” | 3 |
| 7 | Saltonstall v. City of Sacramento | green | “ceqa provides an exception to the prohibition on commitment to a project before environmental review for purposes of land acquisition” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.