4 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 23 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Katherine Lees v. Carthage College.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Katherine Lees v. Carthage College Anchor | green | “the daubert analysis applies to all expert testimony under rule 702, not just scientific testimony.” | 11 |
| 2 | Winters v. Fru-Con Inc. | green | “gate-keeper who determines whether proffered expert testimony is reliable and relevant before accepting a witness as an expert,” | 6 |
| 3 | Adelaida Anderson v. Raymond Corporation | green | “a preliminary assessment of whether the reasoning or methodology underlying the testimony is scientifically valid.” | 3 |
| 4 | Adelaida Anderson v. Raymond Corporation | green | “the soundness and care with which the expert arrived at her opinion” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.