5 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 23 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Bingaman v. Grays Harbor Community Hospital.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Bingaman v. Grays Harbor Community Hospital Anchor | green | “before passion or prejudice can justify reduction of a jury verdict, it must be of such manifest clarity as to make it unmistakable.” | 8 |
| 2 | Bingaman v. Grays Harbor Community Hospital | green | “flagrantly outrageous and extravagant.” | 5 |
| 3 | Bunch v. King County Department of Youth Services | green | “we strongly presume the jury's verdict is correct.” | 4 |
| 4 | Bunch v. King County Department of Youth Services | green | “beyond all measure, unreasonable and outrageous.” | 3 |
| 5 | Bunch v. King County Department of Youth Services | green | “strongly presume the jury's verdict is correct.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.