2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 23 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Katz v. Gerardi.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Katz v. Gerardi Anchor | green | “the plaintiff as master of the complaint may present (or abjure) any claim he likes.” | 17 |
| 2 | Malibu Media, LLC v. John Does 1-6 | green | “whether there is substantial evidentiary overlap in the facts giving rise to the cause of action against each defendant” | 6 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.