7 canonical passages across 7 cases, quoted by 23 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from State v. Wagoner.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | State v. Wagoner Anchor | green | “the lawful means by which the evidence could have been attained must be wholly independent of the illegal actions.” | 5 |
| 2 | State v. Martinez | green | “the ultimate question is whether the search and seizure was reasonable.” | 3 |
| 3 | Boone v. State | green | “the question exactly when has an arrest taken place is in the first instance for the district court to determine.” | 3 |
| 4 | State v. Rowell | green | “any warrantless search analysis must start with the bedrock principle of both federal and state constitutional jurisprudence that searches conducted outside the judicial process, without prior approval by judge or magistrate, are per se unreasonable, subject only to well-delinea…” | 3 |
| 5 | State v. Wilson | green | “whether the defendant's freedom of movement is restrained by formal arrest or of the degree associated with a formal arrest” | 3 |
| 6 | State v. Barragan | green | “in order for a district court to find in favor of the state that the evidence would have inevitably been seized during an inventory search, the court would be required to make at least three factual findings: (1) whether, without the illegally seized evidence, the officers had p…” | 3 |
| 7 | State v. Granville | green | “even if he did not primarily focus on the expansion during the suppression hearing” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.