5 canonical passages across 5 cases, quoted by 23 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from C.S. v. Department of Public Welfare.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | C.S. v. Department of Public Welfare Anchor | green | “if this request is denied, perpetrators may have a right to a hearing.” | 7 |
| 2 | R. v. Com., Dept. of Public Welfare | green | “the pennsylvania supreme court has recognized that the right to reputation, although absent from the federal constitution, is a fundamental right under the pennsylvania constitution” | 5 |
| 3 | G.V. v. Department of Public Welfare | green | “the inquiry into whether the pennsylvania statute reflects adequate process remains seriously in question,” | 5 |
| 4 | Humphries v. County of Los Angeles | green | “the high risk of an erroneous deprivation (about 35-40 in missouri) provides an additional reason that investigation alone is insufficient to support placement on the child abuse registry"); dupuy v. samuels, 397 f.3d 493, 505 (7th cir. 2005) (noting” | 3 |
| 5 | D.C. v. Department of Human Services | green | “in pennsylvania, therefore, reputational harm alone is an affront to one's constitutional rights.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.