7 canonical passages across 7 cases, quoted by 23 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Borst v. Allstate Insurance Co..
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Borst v. Allstate Insurance Co. Anchor | green | “the goal of arbitration is 'to resolve the entire controversy out of court without the formality and expense that normally attaches to the judicial process.” | 5 |
| 2 | Pilgrim Investment Corp. v. Reed | green | “the issues are limited to 'the making of the arbitration agreement or the failure, neglect or refusal to perform' under the agreement.” | 3 |
| 3 | In MATTER OF ARBITRATION BETWEEN KEMP v. Fisher | green | “policy of encouraging arbitration as an alternative to litigation . . . .” | 3 |
| 4 | Milwaukee Professional Firefighters, Local 215 v. City of Milwaukee | green | “judicial review of arbitration awards is very limited.” | 3 |
| 5 | Kimberly Area School District v. Zdanovec | green | “it is a general rule that arbitrability is to be determined by the courts.” | 3 |
| 6 | Lane v. Urgitus | green | “was 'arbitrable' in the sense that it was the type of claim that could have been arbitrated if pursued in a timely manner in the proper venue, the claim was not 'arbitrable' when pursued more than a year after first pursuing the claim in litigation.” | 3 |
| 7 | Werner v. Hendree | green | “a document must meet three conditions in order to be considered a final judgment or order for purposes of appeal: the document must (1) be entered by the circuit court, (2) dispose of the entire matter in litigation as to one or more parties, and (3) state on its face that it is…” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.