3 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 17 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Board v. Board.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Board v. Board Anchor | green | “should the social security benefits be changed, the mother or custodian can look to the estate for satisfaction of the basic obligation which remains intact.” | 6 |
| 2 | Artrip v. Noe | green | “the trial court is vested with broad discretion in the establishment, enforcement, and modification of child support.” | 6 |
| 3 | Board v. Board | green | “there is a distinction between crediting an obligation with payment made from another source and increasing, decreasing or terminating, or otherwise modifying a specific dollar amount.” | 5 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.