5 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 23 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Villescas v. State.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Villescas v. State Anchor | green | “when a defendant has no defense to the enhancement allegation and has not suggested the need for a continuance in order to prepare one, notice given at the beginning of the punishment phase satisfies the federal constitution.” | 10 |
| 2 | Villescas v. State | green | “whether constitutionally adequate notice was given.” | 4 |
| 3 | Pelache v. State | green | “basic due process violation in this case is of appellant's right to know the nature of the enhancement charges he is accused of and the consequences of a conviction before jeopardy attaches.” | 3 |
| 4 | Pelache v. State | green | “define the criminal offense with sufficient definiteness that ordinary people can understand what conduct is prohibited” | 3 |
| 5 | Pelache v. State | green | “specific grounds were apparent from the context.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.