5 canonical passages across 5 cases, quoted by 23 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Rana v. Islam.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Rana v. Islam Anchor | green | “we therefore interpret the nyll and flsa as not allowing duplicative liquidated damages for the same course of conduct.” | 8 |
| 2 | Archie v. Grand Central Partnership, Inc. | green | “local business activities fall within the reach of the flsa when an enterprise employs workers who handle goods or materials that have moved or been produced in interstate commerce.” | 4 |
| 3 | Padilla v. Manlapaz | green | “enterprise engaged in commerce.” | 4 |
| 4 | Glatt v. Fox Searchlight Pictures Inc. | green | “the nyll's definitions are nearly identical to the flsa's.” | 4 |
| 5 | Gortat v. Capala Bros. | green | “the midpoint date . . . through the date judgment is entered.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.