3 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 23 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from State v. Arthur.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | State v. Arthur Anchor | green | “determining which witnesses to call to the stand is one of the most difficult strategic decisions that any trial attorney must confront.” | 13 |
| 2 | State v. Chew | green | “to rebut that presumption, a defendant must establish that trial counsel's actions did not equate to 'sound trial strategy.” | 6 |
| 3 | State v. Arthur | green | “a defense attorney's decision concerning which witnesses to call to the stand is 'an art,' and a court's review of such a decision should be 'highly deferential.” | 4 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.