8 canonical passages across 7 cases, quoted by 23 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Schoeps v. Carmichael.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Schoeps v. Carmichael Anchor | green | “lewd and lascivious conduct toward a child,” | 3 |
| 2 | People v. Johnson | green | “with the brightest cell lights turned on, while making eye contact with her” | 3 |
| 3 | People v. Dallas W. | green | “arousal, gratification, and affront.” | 3 |
| 4 | Krontz v. City of San Diego | green | “had morris been decided today, we have no doubt that it would have recognized the limits on the first amendment protection extended by the united states supreme court in barnes and erie.” | 3 |
| 5 | TINY B., INC. v. City of Newport Beach | green | “had morris been decided today, we have no doubt that it would have recognized the limits on the first amendment protection extended by the united states supreme court in barnes and erie.” | 3 |
| 6 | SOLON | green | “de minimus conduct or harm, such as offensive or provocative physical contact or insults, which is not ordinarily considered to be inherently vile, depraved, or morally reprehensible.” | 3 |
| 7 | People v. Conway | green | “the statute . . . also reaches the specific intent to create sexual arousal in those persons observing the defendant.” | 3 |
| 8 | SOLON | green | “the evil intent, depraved or vicious motive, or corrupt mind associated with moral turpitude.” | 2 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.