6 canonical passages across 6 cases, quoted by 23 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Davis v. State.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Davis v. State Anchor | green | “moreover, proof need not be introduced against the juvenile on each factor.” | 4 |
| 2 | Cobbins v. State | green | “clear and convincing evidence' has been defined by this court as 'that degree of proof which will produce in the trier of fact a firm conviction as to the allegation sought to be established.” | 4 |
| 3 | Bradley v. State | green | “if he or she meets the burden, then the transfer is made unless there is clear and convincing countervailing evidence to support a finding that the juvenile should remain in circuit court.” | 4 |
| 4 | Sims v. State | green | “we have often stated that the serious and violent nature of an offense is a sufficient basis for denying a motion to transfer and trying a juvenile as an adult.” | 4 |
| 5 | Sebastian v. State | green | “is not a factor sufficient in and of itself for a circuit court to retain jurisdiction of a juvenile.” | 4 |
| 6 | Slay v. State | green | “cobbins cannot be read to require that an added element of violence must be shown under 9-27-318(e)(l), and we believe it would be a perverted interpretation to construe that provision in such a manner.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.