4 canonical passages across 4 cases, quoted by 23 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Hoechst Celanese Corp. v. Mendez.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Hoechst Celanese Corp. v. Mendez Anchor | green | “duty of reasonable care is commensurate with the control it retains” | 14 |
| 2 | University of Texas v. Morris | green | “certainly it would not be error for the court to refuse to hold a hearing on a motion for a new trial except where it would be necessary to hear evidence upon a matter such as jury misconduct.” | 3 |
| 3 | Hardin v. Hardin | green | “may be based on the trial court's conclusion that the amendment on its face is calculated to surprise or that the amendment would reshape the cause of action, prejudicing the opposing party and unnecessarily delaying the trial.” | 3 |
| 4 | Pedro Gonzalez & Maria Gomez v. Vatr Construction LLC & All American Roofing & Construction | green | “general supervisory control that does not relate to the activity causing the injury is not sufficient to create a duty.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.