6 canonical passages across 5 cases, quoted by 23 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Fritz v. Glen Mills Schools.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Fritz v. Glen Mills Schools Anchor | green | “a plaintiff's choice of forum is to be given great weight, and the burden is on the party challenging the choice to show it was improper.” | 5 |
| 2 | Zampana-Barry v. Donaghue | green | “employ a quality-quantity analysis.” | 5 |
| 3 | Zampana-Barry v. Donaghue | green | “sufficiently continuous so as to be considered habitual.” | 4 |
| 4 | Mathues v. Tim-Bar Corp. | green | “the question is whether the acts are being 'regularly' performed within the context of the particular business” | 3 |
| 5 | PECO Energy Co. v. Philadelphia Suburban Water Co. | green | “far less in quantity, as well as quality, than the contacts cited” | 3 |
| 6 | Canter v. American Honda Motor Corp. | green | “to demonstrate cars and to consummate sales” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.