4 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 23 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from State v. Guzman.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | State v. Guzman Anchor | green | “a district court abuses its discretion when its decision is based on an erroneous view of the law or is against logic and the facts in the record.” | 12 |
| 2 | State v. Manthey | green | “a mistrial should not be granted unless there is a reasonable probability that the outcome of the trial would be different if the event that prompted the motion had not occurred.” | 5 |
| 3 | State v. Bahtuoh | green | “the district court is in the best position to evaluate the prejudicial impact, if any, of an event occurring during the trial.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.