4 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 23 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from State v. Bernal.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | State v. Bernal Anchor | green | “in which a single act results in multiple charges under different criminal statutes.” | 8 |
| 2 | State v. Ramirez | green | “protects defendants from receiving multiple punishments for the same offense.” | 6 |
| 3 | State v. Silvas | green | “subsumed within the other, then the analysis ends and the statutes are considered the same for double jeopardy purposes.” | 6 |
| 4 | State v. Ramirez | green | “the double jeopardy clause of the fifth amendment, enforced against the states by the fourteenth amendment, protects defendants from receiving multiple punishments for the same offense.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.