Topic: inferences relying on mere speculation or conjecture will n… · Go Syfert
← All topics

Topic #1782

7 canonical passages across 6 cases, quoted by 158 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Trade Finance Partners, LLC v. AAR CORP..

#Case FlagCanonical passage Citers
1 Trade Finance Partners, LLC v. AAR CORP. Anchor
ca7 · 2009
green “inferences relying on mere speculation or conjecture will not suffice.” 51
2 Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, and Judith Keane, Intervenor-Appellant v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.
ca7 · 2000
green “definite, competent evidence to rebut the summary judgment motion.” 34
3 Smith v. Hope School
ca7 · 2009
green “we are not required to draw every conceivable inference from the record . . . we draw only reasonable inferences” 30
4 Trade Finance Partners, LLC v. AAR CORP.
ca7 · 2009
green “inferences relying on mere speculation or conjecture will not suffice” 17
5 Lewis v. City of Chicago
ca7 · 2007
green “weigh evidence or engage in fact-finding,” 16
6 Andre Johnson v. Donald T. Snyder, Eugene McAdory Assistant Warden, Pam Grubman
ca7 · 2006
green “so obvious that even a lay person would easily recognize the necessity for a doctor's attention.” 6
7 Thomas v. Walton
ilsd · 2006
green “deliberate indifference implies at a minimum actual knowledge of impending harm easily preventable, so that a conscious, culpable refusal to prevent harm can be inferred from the defendant's failure to prevent it.” 4

A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.

← Caselaw search · Hot / Trending / Newly red · Brief Check