3 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 23 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Olds v. State.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Olds v. State Anchor | green | “the exclusion of evidence under rule 403 is an extraordinary remedy which should be used only sparingly.” | 12 |
| 2 | Smith v. State | green | “decisions regarding relevance are committed to the sound discretion of the trial court.” | 7 |
| 3 | Booth v. State | green | “any tendency to make the existence of any fact that is of consequence to the determination of the action more probable or less probable than it would be without the evidence.” | 4 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.