Topic: the fourth amendment exclusionary rule should not be applie… · Go Syfert
← All topics

Topic #17829

6 canonical passages across 5 cases, quoted by 23 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from State v. George.

#Case FlagCanonical passage Citers
1 State v. George Anchor
ohio · 1989
green “the fourth amendment exclusionary rule should not be applied so as to bar the use in the prosecution's case-in-chief of evidence obtained by officers acting in objectively reasonable reliance on a search warrant issued by a detached and neutral magistrate but ultimately found to…” 8
2 State v. Clark
ohioctapp · 2016
neutral “mere relinquishment of the keys by appellant” 3
3 State v. Clark
ohioctapp · 2016
neutral “under the color and authority of his badge and uniform.” 3
4 State v. Skeens
ohioctapp · 2018
neutral “a new issue which was not supported by any evidence whatsoever, and basing its decision to suppress the evidence on that issue was prejudicial error to the city.” 3
5 State v. Stubbs
ohioctapp · 2020
green “the affidavit stated the informants and their car were searched before the controlled buy and no contraband was found.” 3
6 State v. Barnes
ohio · 1986
green “the exclusionary rule has traditionally barred from trial physical, tangible materials obtained either during or as a direct result of an unlawful invasion.” 3

A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.

← Caselaw search · Hot / Trending / Newly red · Brief Check