7 canonical passages across 6 cases, quoted by 23 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Toby Joseph Welch v. Iowa Department of Transportation, Motor Vehicle Division.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Toby Joseph Welch v. Iowa Department of Transportation, Motor Vehicle Division Anchor | green | “we have continuously affirmed that the primary objective of the implied consent statute is the removal of dangerous and intoxicated drivers from iowa's roadways in order to safeguard the traveling public.” | 5 |
| 2 | State Of Iowa Vs. Robert Joseph Vance | green | “specific and articulable facts . . . taken together with rational inferences from those facts.” | 3 |
| 3 | State v. Baird | green | “suffice it to say that lemberger does not adequately establish that article i, section 11 possesses a different meaning than the fourth amendment to the united states constitution in this context.” | 3 |
| 4 | People v. Harris | green | “consent is not invalid under the fourth amendment simply because it was given in advance and in exchange for a related benefit, and this is all the implied consent law accomplishes.” | 3 |
| 5 | People v. Harris | green | “in the unique context of giving consent to a search . . . in exchange for a benefit, the person cannot enjoy the benefit only then to renounce the cost, and expect to continue enjoying the benefit.” | 3 |
| 6 | Voss v. Iowa Department of Transportation, Motor Vehicle Division | green | “the clear intent of these advisements is to provide a person who has been requested to submit to a chemical test a basis for evaluation and decision-making in regard to either submitting or not submitting to the test.” | 3 |
| 7 | State v. Padley | green | “we conclude that free and voluntary submission to a blood test, after receiving an advisement under the implied consent law, constitutes actual consent to a blood draw under the fourth amendment.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.