4 canonical passages across 4 cases, quoted by 23 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from In Re Omega Healthcare Inv'rs, Inc. SEC. Litig..
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | In Re Omega Healthcare Inv'rs, Inc. SEC. Litig. Anchor | green | “alleging facts (1) showing that the defendants had both motive and opportunity to commit the fraud or (2) constituting strong circumstantial evidence of conscious misbehavior or recklessness.” | 8 |
| 2 | Noto v. 22nd Century Grp. | green | “the first two elements must be pled with heightened specificity pursuant to the private securities litigation reform act of 1995 and federal rule of civil procedure 9(b).” | 6 |
| 3 | Melendez v. Sirius XM Radio, Inc. | green | “all factual allegations in the complaint are accepted as true and all inferences are drawn in the plaintiff's favor.” | 5 |
| 4 | Set Capital LLC v. Credit Suisse Group AG | green | “rule 9(b) requires litigants to state with particularity the circumstances constituting fraud.” | 4 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.