5 canonical passages across 5 cases, quoted by 22 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Anna M. Hall v. City of Chicago.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Anna M. Hall v. City of Chicago Anchor | green | “courts should not carve up the incidents of harassment and then separately analyze each incident, by itself, to see if each rises to the level of being severe or pervasive.” | 10 |
| 2 | Mallinson-Montague v. Pocrnick | green | “there is nothing in the 1991 amendments to suggest that the case law applying those prior equitable remedies is abrogated.” | 3 |
| 3 | Romelia Hazel Frazier v. Delco Electronics Corporation | green | “a violation of title vii that is based on a claim of harassment by a coworker doesn't occur until the employer has failed to take reasonable steps to bring the harassment to an end.” | 3 |
| 4 | Lisa Dunn v. Washington County Hospital and Thomas J. Coy | green | “the same standard of liability applies to both co-worker and customer harassment.” | 3 |
| 5 | Lapka v. Chertoff | green | “a violation of title vii that is based on a claim of harassment by a coworker doesn't occur until the employer has failed to take reasonable steps to bring the harassment to an end.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.