6 canonical passages across 6 cases, quoted by 22 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Air-Sea Forwarders, Inc. v. Air Asia Company, Ltd., and E-Systems, Inc..
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Air-Sea Forwarders, Inc. v. Air Asia Company, Ltd., and E-Systems, Inc. Anchor | green | “how the state high court would resolve it.” | 6 |
| 2 | State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Boellstorff | green | “they are an integral part of several policies served by the statute of limitations” | 4 |
| 3 | Nevada Power Co. v. Monsanto Company | green | “federal courts exercising diversity jurisdiction are to use state statutes of limitation.” | 3 |
| 4 | Lennon v. First National Bank of Arizona | green | “arizona courts view federal cases construing the federal rule as authoritative, though not controlling.” | 3 |
| 5 | Hosogai v. Kadota | red | “may the statute of limitations for a second wrongful death action be equitably tolled by the filing of a first action dismissed because of a procedural defect?” | 3 |
| 6 | Arizona Department of Revenue v. Dougherty | green | “filing a class claim in an administrative procedure will toll the statute of limitations for all putative class members,” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.