4 canonical passages across 4 cases, quoted by 16 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Brazoria County v. Knutson.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Brazoria County v. Knutson Anchor | green | “arbitration is a proceeding so favored by texas law that both our constitution and statutes provide for the submission of differences to arbitration.” | 6 |
| 2 | Mariner Financial Group, Inc. v. Bossley | green | “from the summary judgment evidence, we know that the bossleys did not learn about the relationship between asmar and nettles until after the arbitration” | 4 |
| 3 | In the Matter of an Arbitration Between Cook Industries, Inc., as Assignee of Rag. Luigi Gandini Voghera, and C. Itoh & Co. (America) Inc. | green | “when a party has knowledge of facts possibly indicating bias or partiality on the part of the arbitrator he cannot remain silent and later object to the award of the arbitrator on that ground.” | 3 |
| 4 | County of Brazoria v. Knotson | green | “arbitration is a proceeding so favored by texas law that both our constitution and statutes provide for the submission of differences to arbitration.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.