3 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 22 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from United States v. Keith Ramon Allen, Jr..
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | United States v. Keith Ramon Allen, Jr. Anchor | green | “in assessing a challenge to a sentencing court's application of the guidelines, we review the court's factual findings for clear error and its legal conclusions de novo.” | 8 |
| 2 | United States v. Keith Ramon Allen, Jr. | green | “we review the court's factual findings for clear error and its legal conclusions de novo.” | 8 |
| 3 | Educational Credit Management Corp. v. Mosko (In Re Mosko) | green | “a finding of fact is clearly erroneous when, 'although there is evidence to support it, the reviewing court on the entire evidence is left with the definite and firm conviction that a mistake has been committed.” | 6 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.