7 canonical passages across 5 cases, quoted by 22 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from State v. Nelson.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | State v. Nelson Anchor | green | “while credibility of witnesses is normally the province of the trial court, a trial court cannot disregard testimony that is uncontradicted and unchallenged where no basis for doing so appears in the record.” | 4 |
| 2 | Interest of S.R.L. | green | “court's findings regarding one factor may be applicable to another.” | 3 |
| 3 | Rustad v. Rustad | green | “explain how the statutory factors apply.” | 3 |
| 4 | Rustad v. Rustad | green | “it is not enough for the district court merely to recite or summarize testimony presented at trial to satisfy the requirement that findings of fact be stated with sufficient specificity.” | 3 |
| 5 | Law v. Whittet | green | “while credibility of witnesses is normally the province of the trial court, a trial court cannot disregard testimony that is uncontradicted and unchallenged where no basis for doing so appears in the record.” | 3 |
| 6 | Rustad v. Rustad | green | “determination of parenting time is a finding of fact subject to the clearly erroneous standard of review.” | 3 |
| 7 | Rustad v. Rustad | green | “determine which party will best promote the child's best interests and welfare.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.