4 canonical passages across 4 cases, quoted by 22 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from In Re the Tax Appeal of Lower Mapunapuna Tenants Ass'n.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | In Re the Tax Appeal of Lower Mapunapuna Tenants Ass'n Anchor | green | “the right of appeal is limited as provided by the legislature and compliance with the methods and procedure prescribed by it is obligatory.” | 6 |
| 2 | Housing Finance & Development Corp. v. Castle | green | “the base requirement for any court resolving a dispute because without jurisdiction, the court has no authority to consider the case.” | 6 |
| 3 | Amantiad v. Odum | green | “the existence of jurisdiction is a question of law that we review de novo under the right/wrong standard.” | 5 |
| 4 | Re Sprinkle Chow Liquor License | green | “the remedy by appeal is not a common law right and exists only by virtue of statutory or constitutional provision.” | 5 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.