5 canonical passages across 4 cases, quoted by 22 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from People v. McDonald.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | People v. McDonald Anchor | green | “when an eyewitness identification of the defendant is a key element of the prosecution's case but is not substantially corroborated by evidence giving it independent reliability, and the defendant offers qualified expert testimony on specific psychological factors shown by the r…” | 10 |
| 2 | People v. McDonald | green | “...specific psychological factors shown by the record...” | 3 |
| 3 | People v. Chambers | green | “people v. chambers (1964) 231 cal.app.2d 23 (chambers) demonstrates the trial court's error in the present case.” | 3 |
| 4 | People v. Geier | green | “are both assaultive crimes against the person and, as such, are 'offenses of the same class' expressly made joinable by section 954.” | 3 |
| 5 | People v. Lind | green | “erred by refusing to sever gutierrez's attempted murder related charges.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.