7 canonical passages across 6 cases, quoted by 22 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from State v. Gobal.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | State v. Gobal Anchor | green | “our supreme court has determined that when one witness vouches for the veracity of another witness, such testimony is an opinion which is not helpful to the jury's determination of a fact in issue and is therefore excluded.” | 4 |
| 2 | State v. Parker | green | “comment on the strength of the state's evidence and the absence of any contradictory evidence.” | 3 |
| 3 | State v. Parker | green | “commenting on the strength of the state's evidence and the absence of any contradictory evidence,” | 3 |
| 4 | State v. Fowler | green | “in construing the exceptions to the general rule, our courts have been liberal in admitting evidence of similar sex crimes.” | 3 |
| 5 | State v. Maddux | green | “for error to constitute plain error, a defendant must demonstrate that a fundamental error occurred at trial.” | 3 |
| 6 | State v. Patterson | green | “charged with committing a sexual offense . . . had committed numerous similar acts upon the victim over a four to five year period, was held competent to show defendant's 'motive and intent,” | 3 |
| 7 | State v. Sturgis | green | “intent, motive and on-going plan to gratify his sexual desires,” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.