3 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 22 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from In the INTEREST OF A.M. & A.M., Children.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | In the INTEREST OF A.M. & A.M., Children Anchor | green | “a parent's decision to engage in illegal drug use during the pendency of a termination suit, when the parent is at risk of losing a child, may support a finding that the parent engaged in conduct that endangered the child's physical or emotional well-being.” | 10 |
| 2 | In Re AB | green | “failure to protect the emotional well-being of the children following the allegations of sexual abuse” | 7 |
| 3 | In re Interest of K-A.B.M. | green | “a child's basic needs include food, shelter, clothing, routine medical care, and a safe, stimulating, and nurturing home environment.” | 5 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.