5 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 22 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Attorney Grievance Commission v. Garfield.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Attorney Grievance Commission v. Garfield Anchor | green | “as the court of original and complete jurisdiction for attorney disciplinary proceedings in maryland, we conduct an independent review of the record.” | 6 |
| 2 | Attorney Grievance Commission v. Dunietz | green | “as to the hearing judge's conclusions of law, 'our consideration is essentially de novo.” | 5 |
| 3 | Attorney Grievance Commission v. Monfried | green | “factual findings of the hearing judge will not be disturbed if they are based on clear and convincing evidence.” | 5 |
| 4 | Attorney Grievance Commission v. Dunietz | green | “as to the hearing judge's conclusions of law,” | 4 |
| 5 | Attorney Grievance Commission v. Garfield | green | “conduct an independent review of the record.” | 2 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.