3 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 22 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Commonwealth v. Melendez-Rodriguez.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Commonwealth v. Melendez-Rodriguez Anchor | green | “a party cannot rectify the failure to preserve an issue by proffering it in response to a rule 1925(b) order.” | 16 |
| 2 | Commonwealth v. Eskridge | green | “an actual conflict of interest affecting the prosecutor exists in the case.” | 3 |
| 3 | Commonwealth v. Jasper | green | “where the trial evidence shows that a violent defendant was incarcerated at the time of trial, no prejudice occurs even when restraints are visible to the jury.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.