4 canonical passages across 4 cases, quoted by 16 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Singfield v. State.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Singfield v. State Anchor | green | “does any member of the jury panel feel that the nature of this case would make it difficult or impossible for you to render a fair and impartial verdict, specifically because this case involves murder with a handgun?” | 4 |
| 2 | Baker v. State | green | “do you have any bias or prejudice concerning handguns which would prevent you from fairly weighing the evidence in this case?” | 4 |
| 3 | Sweet v. State | green | “do the charges stir up strong emotional feelings in you that would affect your ability to be fair and impartial in this case?” | 4 |
| 4 | State v. Shim | green | “does any member of the jury have such strong feelings about that it would be difficult for you to fairly and impartially weigh the facts?” | 4 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.