7 canonical passages across 6 cases, quoted by 22 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Meyers v. Chapman Printing Co., Inc..
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Meyers v. Chapman Printing Co., Inc. Anchor | green | “a contributing and essential factor” | 4 |
| 2 | Caniff v. CSX Transportation, Inc. | green | “we review de novo the trial court's grant or denial of a motion for summary judgment.” | 4 |
| 3 | Northern Kentucky Area Planning Commission v. Cloyd | green | “political subdivision' presumes a political subdivision 'of the commonwealth” | 3 |
| 4 | Wilson v. Kentucky Transportation Cabinet | green | “the public policy of the commonwealth is determined by the general assembly and not by the courts” | 3 |
| 5 | Wilson v. City of Central City | green | “the line between a city, a municipality, and a municipal corporation is not always clear.” | 3 |
| 6 | Wilson v. City of Central City | green | “had the legislature intended the whistleblower act to apply broadly to municipalities, it would have explicitly included them in their definition of 'employer.” | 3 |
| 7 | Benningfield ex rel. Benningfield v. Zinsmeister | green | “it is the role of the general assembly to debate and decide-through legislation-the public policy issues)” | 2 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.