5 canonical passages across 4 cases, quoted by 22 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Carrino v. Novotny.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Carrino v. Novotny Anchor | green | “impregnable unless so distorted and wrong, in the objective and articulated view of a judge, as to manifest with utmost certainty a plain miscarriage of justice.” | 8 |
| 2 | Doe v. Arts | green | “impregnable unless so distorted and wrong, in the objective and articulated view of a judge, as to manifest with utmost certainty a plain miscarriage of justice.” | 6 |
| 3 | State v. Bey | green | “viewed in the context of the entire record.” | 4 |
| 4 | Bender v. Adelson | green | “are so prejudicial that 'it clearly and convincingly appears that there was a miscarriage of justice under the law.” | 2 |
| 5 | Carrino v. Novotny | green | “a jury verdict, from the weight of evidence standpoint, is impregnable unless so distorted and wrong, in the objective and articulated view of a judge, as to manifest with utmost certainty a plain miscarriage of justice.” | 2 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.