3 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 22 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from York v. Rush-Presbyterian-St. Luke's Medical Center.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | York v. Rush-Presbyterian-St. Luke's Medical Center Anchor | green | “reasonable minds might differ as to inferences or conclusions to be drawn from the facts presented.” | 10 |
| 2 | Snelson v. Kamm | green | “it is well established that, in an appeal from a jury verdict, a reviewing court may not simply reweigh the evidence and substitute its judgment for that of the jury.” | 10 |
| 3 | LaSalle Bank, N.A. v. C/HCA Development Corp. | green | “the standard of care for all professionals is "the use of the same degree of knowledge, skill and ability as an ordinarily careful professional would exercise under similar circumstances.” | 2 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.