2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 16 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Hessler, Inc. v. Farrell.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Hessler, Inc. v. Farrell Anchor | green | “manifest purpose of all rule 59 motions is to afford the trial court an opportunity to correct errors” | 9 |
| 2 | Ramon v. Ramon | green | “a motion for reargument is the proper device for seeking reconsideration by the trial court of its findings of fact, conclusion of law, or judgment.” | 7 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.