4 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 22 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from People v. Burge.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | People v. Burge Anchor | green | “as a general rule, the consideration of a factor which is necessarily implicit in an offense cannot be used as an aggravating factor in sentencing.” | 7 |
| 2 | People v. Thurmond | green | “there is a difference between being under age 18 and being significantly under age 18.” | 6 |
| 3 | People v. Thurmond | green | “whether the victim is particularly young” | 5 |
| 4 | People v. White | green | “textbook example of double enhancement.” | 4 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.