5 canonical passages across 4 cases, quoted by 152 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Nasrallah v. Barr.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Nasrallah v. Barr Anchor | green | “the agency's findings of fact are conclusive unless any reasonable adjudicator would be compelled to conclude to the contrary.” | 48 |
| 2 | Nasrallah v. Barr | green | “the agency's 'findings of fact are conclusive unless any reasonable adjudicator would be compelled to conclude to the contrary.” | 42 |
| 3 | Elbert L. BOWLING, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Donna E. SHALALA, Secretary of Health and Human Services, Defendant-Appellee | green | “may not re-weigh the evidence in the record, nor try the issues de novo, nor substitute the court's judgment for the commissioner's, even if the evidence preponderates against the commissioner's decision.” | 37 |
| 4 | Webster v. Kijakazi | green | “aljs are no longer required to give controlling weight to a treating physician's opinion, as was mandated by federal regulations and our caselaw in the past.” | 14 |
| 5 | Keel v. Saul | green | “a case will not be remanded simply because the alj did not use 'magic words.” | 11 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.