4 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 22 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from MATTER OF HOSLEY v. Curry.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | MATTER OF HOSLEY v. Curry Anchor | green | “for a change to a new domicile to be effected, there must be a union of residence in fact and an 'absolute and fixed intention' to abandon the former and make the new locality a fixed and permanent home” | 7 |
| 2 | MATTER OF HOSLEY v. Curry | green | “an existing domicile . . . continues until a new one is acquired, and a party . . . alleging a change in domicile has the burden to prove the change by clear and convincing evidence” | 6 |
| 3 | In Re Revocation of Ancillary Letters Testamentary of the Estate of Newcomb | green | “domicile means living in a locality with intent to make it a fixed and permanent home” | 5 |
| 4 | People v. Ashenden | green | “arises only where a quasi-judicial hearing has been held and evidence taken pursuant to law” | 4 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.