7 canonical passages across 5 cases, quoted by 22 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Reyes v. Bloomingdale Township Electoral Board.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Reyes v. Bloomingdale Township Electoral Board Anchor | green | “judicial review of the decision of an electoral board is intended to remedy arbitrary or unsupported decisions.” | 4 |
| 2 | Leck v. Michaelson | green | “be said to have approved a coherent scheme for altering the election of their officials.” | 3 |
| 3 | Leck v. Michaelson | green | “to be interpreted, supplemented and modified in order to be implemented.” | 3 |
| 4 | People v. Sharp | green | “so ill-defined that their meaning will ultimately be determined by the opinions and whims of the trier of fact rather than objective criteria” | 3 |
| 5 | Lipinski v. Chicago Board of Election Commissioners | green | “that person has been previously elected for two (2) consecutive full four (4) year terms.” | 3 |
| 6 | Lipinski v. Chicago Board of Election Commissioners | green | “with respect to whether a person's service as village president prior to the passage of the referendum is to be considered in determining if that person has served more than eight years in that position.” | 3 |
| 7 | Anderson v. McHenry Township | green | “judicial review of the decision of an electoral board is intended to remedy arbitrary or unsupported decisions.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.