3 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 22 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from McKell v. Washington Mut., Inc..
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | McKell v. Washington Mut., Inc. Anchor | green | “a business practice is unfair within the meaning of the ucl if it violates established public policy or if it is immoral, unethical, oppressive or unscrupulous and causes injury to consumers which outweighs its benefits.” | 11 |
| 2 | Mexia v. Rinker Boat Co., Inc. | green | “the core test of merchantability is fitness for the ordinary purpose for which such goods are used.” | 6 |
| 3 | McKell v. Washington Mut., Inc. | green | “violates established public policy or if it is immoral, unethical, oppressive or unscrupulous and causes injury to consumers which outweighs its benefits.” | 5 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.