5 canonical passages across 5 cases, quoted by 22 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from In Re Marriage of Schulze.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | In Re Marriage of Schulze Anchor | green | “the dissomaster is one of two privately developed computer programs used to calculate guideline child support as required by section 4055, which involves, literally, an algebraic formula.” | 8 |
| 2 | In Re Marriage of Hubner | green | “is a rebuttable presumption affecting the burden of proof and may be rebutted by admissible evidence showing that application of the formula would be unjust or inappropriate in the particular case, consistent with the policy principles set forth in section 4053.” | 5 |
| 3 | Rojas v. Mitchell | green | “render the specified information sua sponte when deviating from the guideline formula.” | 3 |
| 4 | Calcaterra v. Badakhsh | green | “we are mindful that "determination of a child support obligation is a highly regulated area of the law, and the only discretion a trial court possesses is the discretion provided by statute or rule.” | 3 |
| 5 | Sorge v. Sorge | green | “statewide uniform guideline' under section 4055 determines child support according to a complex formula based on each parent's income and custodial time with the child.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.