3 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 151 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Albert Shaw v. Shirley S. Chater, as Commissioner of the Social Security Administration.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Albert Shaw v. Shirley S. Chater, as Commissioner of the Social Security Administration Anchor | green | “a district court may set aside the commissioner's determination that a claimant is not disabled only if the factual findings are not supported by 'substantial evidence' or if the decision is based on legal error.” | 131 |
| 2 | Camille v. Colvin | green | “the alj was permitted to consider treating dr. dawood's treatment notes in weighing the opinions of dr. dawood and consulting psychologist dr. kamin; and she was permitted to conclude that dr. kamin's opinion was more reliable” | 11 |
| 3 | Tricarico v. Colvin | green | “the question is . . . whether the alj's conclusion was 'supported by the record as a whole.” | 9 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.